That's Not Hot Paris Part 2 - Copyright Hullabaloo

*Update: As of February 2023, the legal issue between Paris Hilton and myself has been privately resolved

*Edited Dec. 19 2020
See new developments at the bottom!

Unbelievably, no joke, I woke up this morning to find that I’d been infringed on a SECOND time by Paris Hilton on social media - yeah I know, it’s probably her team bla bla bla Paris Hilton as a company and as a social media influencer is responsible for what happens on her accounts. PERIOD.
It doesn’t matter if you didn’t do the copying with your own hands, if you approve it and you post it, and you’re told it’s infringing but don’t remove it, you are willfully infringing now.

Screenshots from @parishilton shown here for the purpose of information and commentary of a public figure, under Fair Use

Screenshots from @parishilton shown here for the purpose of information and commentary of a public figure, under Fair Use

This same design from a different pic of mine, taken from the actual display graphic for my legit overlay wings rather than purchased, was used by Paris just this September. That incident is documented here: https://www.fancyfairy.com/news/2020/9/17/infringement-is-not-hot-paris-hilton

ParisHiltonInfringementScreenshot.png

The wing photo of mine that’s infringed in the first shot is from my old website that isn’t up anymore, but here’s a screenshot of a FB page post of it.

Screen Shot 2020-08-03 at 9.38.02 PM.png

But I’ve seen these online before!” you’ll say.
And you’d be right.
They’re still taken from my original photos however, and I own the exclusive copyright, which they have no right to do no matter if it’s been one year or ten since I made it. You might not know this but copyright lasts in the US for at least 75 years after the death of the author and in some cases it’s longer than that if it’s a business registered or estate.
I know there’s an organization out there that’s trying to argue they can do what they want with my work because 10 years have passed and they’re sorely mistaken, but that’s another story.

Yes these particular wings were made notorious, and a nuisance I can’t shake off ever since Maryneim on DeviantArt stole my photo years ago and made them into clip art. I think now she goes by Mary Lau or something else, either way she started a big mess and never cleaned it up so she’s on a permanent ban from every using any of my work for any reason among other people.


Next thing you know, other people are stealing from her and uploading them too, and it has been a vicious cycle ever since.
In fact, because Nikki Lipstick infringed on those same wings a few months ago, I became determined to scrub them from the internet, and I’ve finally found some success. They no longer come up with the search terms she told me she used, and if they do it’s well after you see my own, and hey good luck with whatever virus you’ve just installed on your device if you do decide to use stolen goods once you finally scroll down to those shady free art sites.

So it’s almost 4pm Pacific time now, and although I’d gotten an email from Megan Fargo at Paris Hilton Digital, the content’s all still up even though she knows I want it down, even though I’ve sent a formal DMCA to Megan and the other official Paris email address.
Megan wrote:
“Hope this email finds you well,

This is Megan from Paris Hilton Digital, we have been looking into your posts about Paris's use of your wing designs & would like to address some of your concerns.

Paris does not make any of the edits of herself on her own, they are all fan made edits that she loves & reposts, she always credits the fan who made them & if the fan indicates any other tags she will tag them as well.

I have reached out to the fan who made the edit with the wings & she has confirmed with me that she had gotten the wings off a free PNG site, please find the sources attached below”

She signed off and that was it.

Surprisingly, December 17, Instagram removed Paris Hilton’s post in response to my DMCA notice! This was very unexpected, as past attempts had failed in even the most blatant infringement cases, and I hope this trend continues next time I need to report. Because there is unfortunately always going to be a ‘next time’.
I am curious if this recent Supreme Court case decision had anything to do with it?
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/dr-seuss-enterprises-wins-appeal-in-dispute-over-star-trek-mash-up?fbclid=IwAR3wwUK2Z3B0UJOHcDAg_vmyDQJUAQ8tgGLxuvmfvtdNW_uSqnz6ltXlTcg

Screenshot of the email from Instagram notifying me that the post had been removed.

Now I’m just waiting for a response from Twitter and Facebook, let’s hope they also act.


As for Nikki Lipstick:
Bit of a hypocrite if I must say so myself, since she’s called out DollsKill and others for infringement of her designs in the past that were far less blatant than what she did herself.
She actually admitted she knew of my work already and claimed she ‘checked’ to make sure they weren’t the same before downloading the illegal free copy, and thought somehow that excused her.
I’ve slept on blogging this one because she got her minions to lie about what happened and still has some of those lies on her IG posts, got her friends to insist the wings were never mine, to save face without real apology or accountability. And she still has the FB Dollcult group post up without attribution even though she went back to talk about me as ‘fairy lady’ after I repeatedly asked her to remove everything: https://www.facebook.com/groups/281976223234482/permalink/288330002599104

Screenshot from the Nikkilipstick Instagram account for the purpose of information and commentary, under Fair Use

Screenshot from the Nikkilipstick Instagram account for the purpose of information and commentary, under Fair Use

I don’t believe for a second that she really thought the stolen version were originally by someone else entirely, as she was not honest in her conversations with me even if she does post a stream of empty pseudo-inspirational quotes and kissy lip GIFs.
You don’t have to take my word for it, I kept all the receipts and I mean alllll of them. So I may leave out the less important ones that don’t add any real info or repeat it but I have no problem showing more when I have time.
First we have her comments to people who were asking about their source on her IG posts. Crossing fingers these stayed in the right order.

There was an awful lot of additional BS she pulled, generally misrepresenting what happened to make me look like the bad guy wherever she could and her followers were sent over to harass me to argue that the wings weren’t even mine. I’m not going to give them all the satisfaction of showing their trolling tweets but again, I’ve got ‘em if you need to see them and most are probably still up over there.

I went ahead and sent more DMCA’s to Nikki (aka Nikki Winters) to remove that last one in her FB group but she’s ignored me, and was too busy making vaguebook passive aggressive posts about the situation. She has enough social capital and power to convince people of her status as victim in every story and now, she’s even felt the need to name one of her eye shadows ‘fancy fairy’.

Just to drive the point home how not completely ignorant she is about these issues, just as Paris shouldn’t be, here’s some flashes to the past of Nikki’s own copyright accusations, accusations which hang by slim threads where her ‘designs’ are hardly her unique designs at all. Yet she felt she owned these things and is the same person who tries to deny me my own right to my IP.
I am not familiar with this site or these people, but the links do take you to Nikki & friends’ own posts, where I can see that the copyright claims she is trying to make are on things like a sad face, which is too basic and old a concept for her to own, or pink feather puffs, again stuff that’s not very unique at all:
https://lolcow.farm/snow/res/101821.html

The Right and Wrong Way to Handle an Infringement Notification

*Edit 12/21/2019
This issue seems to be resolved. After sending a C&D to 3DUniverse, we came to an agreement and the infringing content has been removed from the marketplace and they have been very amicable, which I appreciate!
They’ve informed me that the copy of my design was first obtained through publicdomainvectors.org, however, it can no longer be found on that site.
I’m taking it on good faith that is indeed where it was first found, though there is no hard evidence or receipt, so this is where this issue ends with 3DUniverse, however I will still be demanding removal of any copies of the wings being redistributed that were created with the infringed content in the Mythical Pixie package via the extended license that was offered.
~
It happened again, of course, I was minding my own business on Etsy just browsing for gift ideas and saw that one of the things in the “things you might like” section of the home page had a very familiar silhouette. I opened it up and sure enough, my Titania wings had been copied in a $2 pack of wing png files :/

I purchased a set of the wing pack just to make sure, and it was definitely a copy of my Titania wings - a design that I also offer digital files of myself, so this was in direct competition with my own product!
I left a negative review, because not only was my design in there but I recognize a few others of these wings as well, from stock I’ve seen offered by other sellers. Most of the time, stock providers don’t allow their customers to simply redistribute the same stock, so whenever I see sellers offering mostly other people’s content my alarm bells go off.
I then got an angry message from the seller, telling me it’s certainly NOT my content, because he purchased it from 3DUniverse on DAZ3D!
Well, he was right about one thing, it as of now is still available in a pack for a Pixie character and what’s worse is it has an extended license available to allow customers to do exactly what this seller did, and sell 2D renders of all the content >:(
This is incredibly frustrating and disappointing, since 3DUniverse appears to be a fairly big company with well known clients, and they claim that all their designing is done in-house from concept to completion.
Someone along the way decided to simply swipe a design off the internet - mine - instead of creating something new, and now who knows how many people are out there having paid licensing fees for wing files they thought were legit and won’t be able to use.

Sadly, the Etsy seller, even after informing him of 3DUniverse’s infringement and providing my US Copyright certificate registration number, still insisted he had the right to continue selling the copies of my content.
A DMCA did take care of that, and the listings are now gone, but due to the willful continued infringement & his refusal to abide by my demands as the copyright holder, that review will stay.
Please, if you see this wing design anywhere else but in my own Shopify or Etsy stores, let me know.
Currently I don’t have them on any other platform. If I do in the future, my name will be attached to it and linked to my brand. If you like that wing design, I have them for sale in my store and you can rest assured they are the real deal: https://fancy-fairy-wings-things.myshopify.com/products/titania-fairy-wings-transparency-stock-png-files

It’s similar to the defiant attitude I’ve encountered with another person, after she made wings using my tutorial but used one of my original designs rather than the real butterfly design I provide for that purpose.
I made every effort in that tutorial to make it clear that copying designs found online is not legal and disrespects the artists being copied. I even included links to a couple of IP attorney’s websites so people could educate themselves further about what is okay and what’s not.
I had asked her to please edit the caption to let people know that particular design should not be copied as it’s my original, and was told she would, but instead the caption read as if I gave permission for and taught how to make that particular design!
That will not do, so I asked again, but instead of doing so she insisted it didn’t matter because most of her followers aren’t there for her ‘artisticness’ and she got them off of Pinterest.
I reminded her that copying something off of Pinterest is exactly what I instruct people not to do in my tutorial! It’s mentioned in the first 2 minutes before the tutorial portion starts, and regardless of where it’s found it’s still my design.
She told me she removed it ‘just to make you feel better’, but hid her profile from the public so I couldn’t verify it, until this weekend when it went public again and I could see that she had lied, and the post was still there with nothing changed.
Fairies, please don’t ever do this.
It doesn’t matter if you found the content by accident or false advertisement, you still have to respect the original copyright holder’s wishes and comply with what they ask of you. It still affects our business negatively, whether or not the copy is being sold.
Publicly displaying wings made from my tutorial that copy one of my original designs that I didn’t allow only gives others the impression they can do the same, possibly leading eventually to someone deciding to sell them as well.

I had hoped to have some more items to list today for sale, but every infringement dealt with takes the wind out of my sails and delays my production.
There was another seller on Etsy selling wing stock of my Teasel design as well, they at least suspended the listing however they insisted they purchased them with a license without being able to tell me yet who they purchased it from.
If you are professional business selling third party content, you really should have record of everyone you purchased a license from. These things happen all the time - they even said it happens to them - so any graphics business should know better than to not keep track of purchased content they are reselling.
It could be true, but it could also be a bluff, since initially they said “we must insist these overlays are not copied and have been made by us! The fairy wing design is very simplistic and is used by many shops for their overlays”. It’s somewhat of a contradictory statement, so which is it? Made by you, or purchased by you from elsewhere?

My designs are quite popular and some older ones especially on Pinterest that have lost the original links to Polyvore or my old website are still around, but again, everything on Pinterest belongs to someone.
Just like every image on Google belongs to someone. Search engines are not image banks for our use, and even image banks sometimes contain infringing content. It’s sad but true.
We really have to thoroughly vet everything. If there is no consistent style or quality to the seller’s collection or you’re seeing content from them that you’ve also seen elsewhere, keep digging to find out if that is truly the original artist.
Tineye.com comes in handy for this purpose, though if it’s not the same exact photo it might not show up in the results.
The best way to make sure what you’re selling is safe, is to make it yourself from scratch, or from nature.
Or, from an artist with a history of creations that you can track, like me.