Bad Katz is Fighting My DMCA in Second Life™

If you recall my last blog post about my Titania Fairy Wings being infringed by Bad Katz, known as Katz Republic in Second Life™, there’s now a part 2 because she filed a counter notice with Linden Labs which forced me to sue her in order to defend my IP, and I found MORE evidence she infringed my IP . The full details of the claim aren’t publicly visible yet as of this writing, but the link is https://dockets.ccb.gov/case/detail/26-CCB-0586 and shows the names of the parties involved. It should be fully visible within a couple days.

Ironically, she’d asked me to remove her city and state from the screenshot of her Etsy purchase receipt in my previous blog post and now that, and her real life name will become public record as that is what the CCB requires.
If you missed the 1st post you can see it here, and below is a comparison of my original wings and her infringing ones from my Exhibit A file. Ignore the coloring, and look at the veins as well as the outline, which you can see matches almost perfectly to that 2007 real life wings photo of mine.
The SL image of my wings shows the version I had in SL before she released her infringing version. Below that are the counter notices.

I found my 2017 Titania 2.0 wings vendor image so I could prove they predated Katz’s infringing use in SL as well. Below is a screenshot of that file with the info from my hard drive, because unfortunately SL’s Marketplace doesn’t show original listing dates. I wish they would.

For the heck of it, this was my oldest Titania Fairy Wings product ever as far as I know, back in July 2007.

Even if she never saw my wings in SL, I can prove that my Titania design was on Etsy months before she released the infringing items, as this sales email shows they were in my shop at least since August 31, 2018.

And, although it might be too late now to edit my claim details, I should be able to add this file, which is a screenshot of my email notice from an SL group that Katz was also in, announcing the release of the Pixie meshes! I literally just found this in the middle of making this blog post. As you can see, the date is Nov. 3 2018 which is months after the confirmed presence of my Titania overlays in my Etsy shop and a year after I re-released them in SL.

Oh and if she tries to argue that the curls on the tips and tails relieve her of an infringement charge, guess what - I’ve made them already with curls myself over a decade ago in 2010 as seen below, and posted them to my Deviant Art gallery here: https://www.deviantart.com/faeryazarelle/art/Titania-Grand-Wings-side-160183242.

There was also the infringement of my Bee Fairy wings overlays, which expressly forbid using in Second Life™ in the Terms of Use, that I had proof of her purchasing from me but the infringing texture I bought from her before she removed listings wasn’t all that obvious.

But then I found this SL image from one of her customers, Mondi Beaumont, that confirmed she used them, shown here under fair use solely for the purposes of news reporting & showing evidence of a legal claim. I darkened that image just slightly and color corrected to bring out the green & cyan to more clearly show those highlights & shadows near the wings’ tips, which perfectly match my Bee Fairy Wings texture - and it’s a texture that came from a combo of my real life wings photo and digital hand painting & editing. I edited the colors in my Bee Fairy Wings to match the image & warped them the same way Katz did, then inserted that into a mask shaped like her wing shape - and it’s nearly a perfect match that’s impossible to be an accident.

This was the only listing I managed to grab a screenshot of before things got removed. It wouldn’t have been quite as bad if she wasn’t selling the texture itself, but this woman has that kind of audacity.

In addition to all of this evidence, I got a message from a disabled SL creator after I posted about the issue in an SL Discord group, who says they had a similar experience with Katz!
They said Katz had used their script but violated the terms, and after making an agreement to pay the scripter a percentage of all sales of the items containing that script, Katz eventually stopped paying. When Lunasea used the DMCA process to have the item(s) removed, Katz sent a counter notice. As this was before the CCB became available, they could not afford to sue her in court, so Katz continued to profit unfairly off their work without paying the agreed upon royalties.
Lunasea also says “I also found that she and her partner frequently obtain meshes from stock model sites for use in SL (often after decimating the model, keeping the UV and primary structure remind the same). I reported this to both Turbo Squid and CG Trader though I doubt anything came of it.”

None of these allegations are surprising to me.
Her over the top reaction to my DMCA, contradictions of her own words, and false accusations against me already led me to believe she was trying to deflect after getting caught. Like a cornered animal, she was lashing out with anything she thought might hurt my reputation.

She even left comments on the previous blog post which you can see, asking me to censor the Paypal receipt even further by also hiding her city and state, and to watermark the screenshot texture of her wings. I found that funny since at least one of the wing textures - she strangely layered mine on top of another texture like a cicada wing and she also displays the whole texture in her Marketplace listings - I went ahead and did those things, all while she continued to insult me and lie about the situation, publishing her comments and mine despite her assumptions that I would keep them hidden.

I have nothing to hide. Now that I’ve had to go through the whole process of putting together a legal claim and evidence & had to actually spend money to do so, I would like monetary compensation for infringement. With her defamatory statements in her group notice and my blog post comments, I can prove the infringement with intent to harm my business, and now I’d like to know just how much money she’s made off of my IP.

My Titania Fairy Wings Infringed *Again* in Second Life by Full Perm Store

I’m sorry I’ve been so quiet, I have some big news that will explain some of my silence and some of it ties into this infringement which I’ll say more about at the end.

Photo from Second Life showing a sitting elf statue wearing sheer white fairy wings with white veins, pointed upper panels and lower panels with a tail, beside it are fairy wings of the same shape and design in pastel sheer buble colors.

Above, you can see the ‘Bad Katz Pixie Sitting’ mesh character wearing fairy wings that are very much the same as my own Titania Fairy Wings I have in SL which are placed right besides it to show the similarities. She curled the tips of the upper panel and the tails, and the tails have been very slightly warped but none of those tiny alterations are transformative enough to make any of this acceptable.
’Substantial Similarity’ is what courts look for, and whether the core or ‘heart’ of the design has been used. This fits the bill.

I didn’t get a chance to save screenshots of all the individual Marketplace listings before she started removing them. I guess the customer I initially approached about this must have let Katz know so she started removing - or maybe only hiding or archiving the listings, because I still got a notification from LL that they’d removed all the infringing mesh ‘pixie’ characters.

Above are the 2 DMCA reports I sent for Bad Katz items. There are 2 because I also reported some of the fairy mesh characters and textures she was selling since she’d bought my Bee Fairy Wings Stock in 2017, and it appears she used those overlays in her SL item and violated the terms of use that clearly state they must NOT be used in Second Life. Crediting me is also a requirement that appears to be violated.
The Terms of Use included with the older version she purchased is below, under the wings overlay graphic. The only difference with the current version is the newer one includes even more information.
You can also see those overlays on my site now here:
https://fancy-fairy-wings-things.myshopify.com/products/bee-fairy-wings-transparency-stock

Listing graphic for the Bee Fairy Wings showing different colored versions of the iridescent wings against a dark green background with text saying *Stock rules apply, NOT for redisribution!
Screenshot of the Terms of Use file included with the Bee Fairy Wings Transparency Stock that Bad Katz purchased, stating it's not to be distributed in any way in Second Life

I’m not sure if she realizes I have the receipt for her order from Paypal (above) showing her Bad Katz company name, but I did include that information in my report to LL. I’d assume they would send all that to her, but I’m not 100% sure.
She bought them through Etsy however, before I took them down from there to only sell from my website. This was when we’d get 2 receipts before Etsy started processing the funds from orders using Paypal themselves, so I got an order notice from Etsy with her real life name, address & phone number which matched her contact info on the Paypal receipt for that same purchase.

Paypal sale receipt from Bad Katz for Iridescent Bee Fairy Wings Transparencies PNG Files, with email, ph# and address censored except for the state and country

Unfortunately she started hiding or archiving some of these items before I could take more screenshots. Above are the Bad Katz Fairy Texture Christmas and the Bad Katz Fairy Texture Blue. The Christmas version probably showed the wing details with what looks like my iridescent highlights more clearly, but I didn’t get a chance to purchase those to view them up close. If she has proof that what’s in use was not my overlays I’d love to see that.
But knowing that my Titania wings were for certain copied, I’m pretty sure the overlays were used and either way it shows access to my designs from my own shop and awareness of my ownership of them.
While I obviously don’t own exclusive rights to bee wings, I DO own the rights to this version of them. The overlays are from a real life photo of the real life wings I made, and then further edited and painted on. I don’t understand why those overlays would be used instead of a texture that actually fit that wing shape correctly or just, you know, create the vein work entirely.

A day or so ago I got a notice showing I’d been ejected from the Bad Katz Textures group in SL. I find it funny how those who’ve infringed on my copyright tend to be the ones to somehow block me, when I should be the one doing the blocking and they should probably be doing some apologizing or explaining but it’s so common that I’ve gotten used to that behavior.
But today, I friend showed me this notecard from her group, shown below.

Screenshot of a text notecard from Bad Katz Republic in SL filled with lies and misrepresentation of my efforts to address the infringements spawned by her products.

This kind of response is sadly pretty typical when I catch someone infringing on my work. Over-the-top false accusations against me that I’m ‘harassing’ them or others, insulting my character, although accusing me also of being drunk or having paranoid delusions due to drugs is a pretty unhinged thing to say in response to a DMCA notice.

She falsely claims I’ve harassed her customers, when what actually happened was that I sent a fairly polite message and notecard to the person asking them to remove the items infringing on my Titania fairy wings. I even told them I understand if they came across my design from a third party since this design has been so frequently stolen and redistributed online. I usually don’t even do this, I started going straight to DMCA reports a while back because of the aggressive responses some infringers gave me but I thought I’d try this time in case they did indeed get it from a source who distributed it illegally & represented it as their own.
I also noticed the 2 customers were both selling the same ‘pixie’ and ‘fairy’ meshes so I figured there was a common source.
One of them was kind enough to let me know who they bought it from.

The other was Xanthe Firehawk of Enchanted Fantasy. I wasn’t going to call them out initially since I assumed they didn’t know at first. But after they responded almost as badly as Katz did in messages, ejected me from their group, then banned me from their main store, they start to seem suspicious of hiding things from me. They did remove some of the items, as LL mentioned a few that they couldn’t locate, which I even thanked them for, but getting banned or blocked is always a red flag - I had not even banned them from my store like I probably will now. So since I’m experiencing defamation of character by Katz and she seems to be commiserating with Enchanted Fantasy about this, I’d like to head off any potential slander or libel that may be coming from them as well and show you exactly how our conversation actually went, below. And I do consider that notice from Katz to be actual libel. Notifying someone of infringement isn’t harassment, I’m not under drug induced paranoid delusions, and she did in fact infringe on my Titania Fairy Wings as well as violated my license terms if she used those Bee Fairy Wings textures in SL which it appears she has.

This is what I was met with the next time I tried to visit their main store - ban lines.

Screenshot showing my SL avatar in a 'ban box' with yellow ban lines. The SLurl shows 'DO NOT RETURN BOX, Enchanted Wood, which is where Enchanted Fantasy is located.

So fairies, this kind of thing is why I’m going right back to simply reporting infringements rather than try to be nice and give them a heads up to fix it on their own. It’s usually not worth the vitriol I get when I do try to communicate directly.

Ironically, Katz is complaining that I never mentioned the infringements to her directly but she had every chance to reach out to me as well after her customer let her know about the issue. I had not banned or blocked her yet but I will now.

Katz says she’s going to counter the removals with a counter notice.
Well if she does so she’ll need to provide all her real life contact information when she does so. Providing false contact information is a violation of DMCA law and they would not need legal escalation from me to get in trouble for that.
It would also force me to escalate to a legal claim, which I’m more than happy to file if it comes down to it. I’m willing to look at her argument that she didn’t use my Bee Fairy overlays if she can prove that, but the Titania wings are 100% my original design and I will not allow those to go back up under any circumstances.

I’ve had several legal copyright settlements, filed several CCB lawsuits, a couple federal ones, and in fact just won my first lawsuit a month ago for the same Titania Fairy Wings design although I still haven’t gotten paid and have no idea if I ever will, due to the infringers being overseas.
That’s the big news I’ve been sitting on, and still processing, while I get ready to release new wing designs (possibly next week!) and try to develop different items that may sell better in this tough economy.

If you’re curious about the details of that, I’ve written about it in my Patreon and you can read it for free without a subscription. I have no energy left now to make another blog post about it here tonight:
https://www.patreon.com/faeryangela/posts/i-won-my-first-161112980

Adventures and Setbacks In Becoming Tiny, and Fantasy Faire Extended

It took me over a week of all my nights and free time trying to put together a good petite fairy avatar to show you I have wings for them and Dinkies too! Some of that time was unfortunately also spent dealing with an infringement of my Teasel Fairy Wings from a prominent Dinkie creator at Fantasy Faire. Read on for more.

Second Life photo showing a human sized fairy in purple, looking at a tiny fairy & fairy cat flying near

Petites aren’t as common on the grid these days, and creators like Yabusaka, who also made the bodies for the Fallen Gods petite avatars, seem to have disappeared along with some of the brands that made clothing for them. That made it tougher to put together a cute look for them, but Dinkies and outfits for them are everywhere!
I got myself a pink cat body and easily found this ridiculously adorable ‘Watermelly’ outfit from Micachan Store ( http://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/Melloona/43/232/64 ) to go with my Titania Watermelon ‘Fruit Fairy’ wings at Melloona, where I couldn’t resist taking photos near the watermelon juice pool.
It’s like these wings and that region were made for each other, and I almost ended up with my Fantasy Faire store there.

SL photo of a pink dinkie cat wearing a watermelon outfit and matching wings, floating over a watermelon pool with giant watermelon slices in the background

Since the fair has been extended to midnight on the 13th, you still have today and tomorrow to shop! If you’d like to try my fairy wings, here’s my Fantasy Faire LM:
https://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/Amon%20Galadrann/52/25/82

Back to my quest to create a cute petite fairy avatar.

I decided on the Yabusaka 3 Petite female body, which comes ‘Omega ready’, an ancient (sort of) applier method of putting on skins and system clothing that was in use before all the bodies started using BOM and providing their own appliers for creators to use.
There’s actually a Universal BOM Converter that works with Omega Ready bodies so that we can use BOM skins and system clothes on bodies like the Yabusaka petite, so I got that as well as an eye alpha which didn’t come with the Yabusaka body. If everything looks fine except you have huge bug eyes, you need to wear that eye alpha.

It took me a minute to figure out how to use the appliers and BOM converter since there wasn’t much instruction in either one, but what I figured out is you wear / ‘add’ both the Skin Applier (or whatever layer you need to add to) and BOM Converter to your HUD, and click on both.
If your body is all red, that probably means you need to remove the body alpha.

For the head, you’ll need to use a system skin that includes it and uses the old SL UV map or it will look wrong & upside down, so all those EVOX head skins won’t work.
But some of those ancient system skins will, as will the head skins for Genus or any head skin that uses the original SL UV map.

You don’t need the clothing layer mesh that comes with the Yabusaka body for putting on skins or makeup, but you do if you want to add system / BOM tattoo layers or clothes with the clothing applier. For that, it seems you need to wear the clothing & makeup HUD that comes with the body, and to click on all the layer buttons so the BOM layers show.
Some clothing layers get wonky in certain body areas like the hips, so there’s no guarantee they’ll all work flawlessly but it sure gives us a lot more options for customizing a Petite fairy avie!

Bare Rose still sells some clothing for Petites, although for some strange reason their perms are no copy, and WishBox still has some nice Petites items that do have copy permissions. Wasabi Pills on Marketplace has some longer styles from some years ago, and newer short styles that are unrigged & resizeable.
I may come back with a list or new post with more sources for shopping when I have more time. Let me know if you’d like that.

Discovery of my Teasel Fairy Wings infringed

Unfortunately, the reduction in available items for petites was not the only issue delaying my progress.
After a kind soul showed me the newer Ruth petite body & head by Jinx early on, and gave me some suggestions for creators making clothes for them such as Isaura Simons, I went shopping.
I was having trouble getting the Jinx head to look right so I’m glad I got it for only $50L at faire & the body was free there which is also nice because there are so few brands making outfits for them. There are enough differences between that one and the Yabusaka 3 Petite bodies that most of the older petite outfits I found didn’t fit the Ruth body right.

Then, after finding the Jinx Facebook group & asking where I could find more outfits & hair for petites, I was invited to the Petites Discord where I was told I may find some of that info.

That’s when I saw the infringement of my Teasel wings. Right there in the shopping channel, someone posted a video of Isaura’s Petite Goth Fairy outfit which made it easier to see the details and that my photo of my real life Teasel fairy wings was used as the texture.

side by side images showing a purple wing next to the real life photo that was used as the texture for it

Since the infringement was right there in the channel, I responded to that post and commented that it’s infringing my Teasel fairy wings & provided links to my real life image that was used as well as to my Second Life wings of that design.
I even made clear that it probably wasn’t intentional & that Isaura may have come across it via a 3rd party who stole it from me.
Here’s the link to my old Wordpress blog where I posted this particular photo in 2008:
https://fancyfairy.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/new-pair-of-teasel-wings-for-sale-and-a-peak-at-the-rl-azarelle-dress/

I was met with a sort of hostile response from Julala, who said “They don’t look anything like your wings - what are you on about?”, and then told me to file a DMCA & not deal with it through that server.
Screenshots of that entire conversation below.

I responded that I was disappointed in that response, asked if they were really okay with people’s work being used without permission and tried explaining that I mentioned it since there are no rules about discussing infringement in that server & requested it be added to the Rules.

Julala’s response included her saying that the rules say ‘not to be an asshat’ and that I can interpret that how I want, inviting me to leave the group if it was too vague for me.
Isaura was not even in that group when I checked. I further explained I’m autistic & how helpful clear guidelines are, etc.
Cinny Fluffington then stepped in to also deny that the wings had any similarity at all, said all wings look similar and that ‘that’s not how copyright works’.

They complained about me causing ‘drama’, yet either one could have simply told me to message the admin privately or not to post about infringement in that channel & left it at that, rather than belittle me and my copyright in my work, which is what actually created the drama they say they don’t want.

All screenshots are above so you can read exactly what happened for yourself without bias from me.

I do think it’s unfortunate that in some circles in SL, pointing out copyright infringement is treated as a worse violation than infringement itself. This is not the first time I’ve encountered this attitude even when it’s very obvious, and so far it’s historically been employed when the infringer is someone they’re either friends with or profit from in some way, so they don’t have any incentive to do the right thing or criticize their creator friend if their policy is to stay loyal regardless of bad behavior.

I left that group and blocked those 2 creators plus a 3rd that was reacting with hearts on the insulting comments, because after a couple decades of having my IP stolen & met with vitriol I don’t want any contact with those who excuse or exhibit that behavior.
I realize Julala is more established and has a larger presence than I do in SL, being the developer of Herb & Fable and responsible for one of the Fantasy Faire regions, that Cinny is also tightly connected, and that’s precisely why I felt I should get the facts straight before a twisted version of them gets spread around behind the scenes to hurt my reputation.
Been there before, and I’d like to avoid it.

I had no animosity towards Isaura and hoped I’d eventually get a response that included an apology and how it was an innocent mistake.

But then, after Fantasy Faire removed the 2 infringing vendors on Saturday, I finally got a notecard from Isaura. Here it is, along with my responses below.

She’s refusing to cooperate or continue conversing with me, insisting that it’s all her creation when my photo is there in her texture plain as day to anyone who has an artist’s eye. Maybe even those who don’t.

She also put the vendors back up. She seemed to not know that Fantasy Faire had already removed them at the time of her initial notecard.

I reported the updates to the Fantasy Faire team that day, and as of last night the vendors were removed again. As far as who removed them, I’m not really sure. The person most in charge has not responded to me yet since my last message but 2 others on the team said it was not them.
I did report it to Linden Labs so it’s possible they removed it without updating me via email yet, but it’s also possible Isaura had a change of heart.

I blocked her after she told me she didn’t want to communicate with me anymore, but my website has a contact form for email that is still open to any of these people to use should they decide to reach out. Perhaps they were in a more emotional state at the time and could later see more clearly what the problem was.

Those are all my relevant receipts of the situation. If anyone has questions or needs more details, let me know as I’m happy to give it. I’m not hiding anything.

Copyright registration just got a lot more affordable for 2D artists

Tomorrow, artists will be able to register up to 20 PUBLISHED 2D works in one application!

Email screenshot from Copyright.gov announcing that 2D artwork can be registered in a group of up to 20 different works on a single registration, starting February 17, 2026

Attention all artists!
After February 17 2026, we can now register up to 20 different 2D works - designs, drawings, paintings and other 2D pieces - in one single application with the US Copyright Office!
Currently, we've only been able to register a group of up to 10 pieces of 2D art only if they haven't been published anywhere. This is why I haven't been showing my new wing designs until I've finished and registered a whole group of them. That's still the best protection but it's nice to have another option.
The only other type that can be registered after publication as a group are photos, more than 700 at a time IIRC as long as they were all published the same year.
Or the images have to be a part of a collection such as an art book or pack of clip art that includes all of them for the first time if I remember correctly.

This is a big deal y'all.
Artists who produce a lot of different works in a year often would neglect to register anything due to expense or only pick a few popular pieces, as it doesn't always make sense to hold back on showing or selling a piece until you have a bunch of them. Especially in the age of social media where people expect us to share WIPs, where we need to quickly keep creating new things to keep income flowing & work even harder to be seen over all the AI content out there saturating the market.

While it's true that you own the copyright of a work as soon as you make it (as long as it meets the requirements of a protectable work), if someone infringes on your copyright by distributing or selling your work without consent you HAVE TO have a valid copyright registration certificate in order to fight it legally.
Whether you're filing a legal claim with the Copyright Claims Board, which only requires that you've at least submitted your application for registration and it's only roughly $100 to file with no attorney required, or in federal court which requires you to not only have applied but to also have it approved with the certificate in hand, registration is a requirement if you want to get any money out of the infringing party.

You don't need to be wealthy to enforce your copyright.
Now you may be thinking you can't afford a federal lawsuit, which is where you'd get the most damages awarded, but some attorneys take cases on contingency IF you've properly registered and have a strong case against a defendant they think will be able to pay. That means, you don't pay them but if you win or get a settlement, they take a percentage of that money.
Sometimes attorneys will offer a settlement negotiation first to the offending party, but that only works if you have a strong case and have registered your work because they may ignore you without a valid threat of being sued.

The cost of registration could be expensive however, starting at $45 for a single work by a single author / artist. You can see how the cost could be a barrier for a low income artist especially one creating many works within a year, and why I think this is something to celebrate.
I don't know yet how much it will cost for the group registration of published 2D works, but the cost for an un-published group is $85 so I expect an amount close to that.
It's well worth it, if at the end of the year you have at least 20 pieces you want to protect but haven't registered yet.

I believe we should be able to now register old works this way that we couldn't afford to register before, although keep in mind that since courts consider registrations done within 5 years of publication to be 'prima facie' and the registration won't be questioned, it's important to do it as soon as you're able.
That doesn't mean you can't register or can't litigate works registered after that point, but you may need to provide more evidence of ownership in that case.

Now I should state that I'm not an attorney, and this does not constitute official legal advice.
However, I've had quite a bit of experience dealing with copycats, settlements, CCB claims and even a couple federal court cases and there are things I wish I knew years ago, so I'd like to share what I can to help other artists.

If you've been as unlucky as me to have your work infringed en masse by a LOT of different overseas sellers, you'll want to subscribe to my Patreon for my posts about that. Some of that info may be paywalled for good reasons I can’t go into detail about yet, but please feel free to reach out if you are experiencing that yourself as I may be able to give you some helpful info and legal referrals.

I'll end with this:
If it weren't for registering my work and being able to get what I'm owed from infringing parties, I might have had to shut down Fancy Fairy last year or at least get a part time 'real job' like so many other artists have recently been forced to. Increased art theft had already made things really hard, and Trump's BS only made everything that much harder making this one of my worst winters for sales that I can remember.

Any artist being infringed should get their payback, and this rule change will make that easier! Share this info with your artist friends, and let's keep artists in business.

~
Alt text for screenshot:

Group Registration for Two-Dimensional Artwork Final Rule

NewsNet 1078 
December 19, 2025

The U.S. Copyright Office has created a new group registration option known as Group Registration for Two-Dimensional Artwork, or GR2D, to allow artists to register a group of published two-dimensional artworks by submitting a deposit comprising one complete digital copy of each work within the group. The final rule expands the registration options currently available to artists and permits the registration of multiple works with a single application and one filing fee.

The final rule also announces a new online registration application for this group option. The proposed rule would have allowed applicants to register up to ten works published within a thirty-day period. Based on commenters’ input and to facilitate broader participation in the registration system, the final rule permits applicants to register up to twenty works, where all works within the group were first published within the same calendar year.

The final rule takes effect on February 17, 2026, to coincide with the expected completion of related system development and educational resources. The Office will issue an additional public announcement when this option is available to applicants. For more information, please visit the Copyright Office website

 United States Copyright Office
copyright.gov
(202) 707-3000
or 1 (877) 476-0778 (toll free)

Fancy Fairy Second Life News

I’ve got a new gift at the SL Shop & Hop, and news about a copycat that doubled down at the We <3 Roleplay event

Second Life photo of a slender pale female avatar wearing a purple & black corset, skirt and tattered fairy wings

I didn’t get accepted for my own booth for the Second Life Shop & Hop sales event happening in world, so I’m sharing space with my good friend Siyu Suen of Illusions, who makes the jewelry and ears I’m wearing here. At the front counter you’ll find a couple gift boxes, the round hat box contains the tattered Teasel Unseelie fairy wings you see here. These are solid rather than transparent so no alpha glitch, and this version features lots of holes & tatters.

I’m also wearing a brand new mesh corset loosely based on historical stays that was made for me by a pro based on my sketches, and an optional skirt. I’m still working on texturing as well as on the Titania 3.0 wings so it’s not out yet, but keep an eye out for it soon!

Fairyzette Sahara strikes again

Side-by-side images showing my real life Acorn wings on the left and the infringing SL copy on the right

I’ve posted in my blog about this creator a few months ago already as she’d copied several of my designs, so I was shocked to find she’d gone and released one of them again with minimal changes at the October We <3 Roleplay event.
Below is the PrimFeed posts advertising the costume pack containing the wings, which has now been removed.

One of the big reasons I’m sharing details here is because of the way the situation was handled by the event owners / organizers, and my previous experiences with people who engaged in some form of slander / libel against me in retaliation for expecting them to follow their own rules they claim to enforce.

I didn’t have high confidence that this would be dealt with quickly due to my previous interactions with one of the owners, who admitted to ignoring my message to her about a different infringer because they weren’t selling the thing at her event specifically.
The only reason I did let her know, is because their rules seem to say that those who copy others’ work are not considered for their events, period, and a friend urged me to let them know, assuming they cared about copyright as much as we do.
After not hearing back from her for a couple weeks, my friend made a group chat with me and Voshie, the event owner, thinking she must have been really busy and missed the message.
Her response was “Hey there, I actually have received your message, however I chose not to respond as I feel like this is not WLRP's concern as it was never at our event.”

Considering her lack of concern, I didn’t have a lot of faith I’d get a response for this infringing creator either but I messaged her on Sept. 30th with screenshots of the prior DMCA removals & all my evidence, and sent the co-owner a message in world along with a notecard. I sent Voshie a notecard too, stating the facts of the matter.
I didn’t hear from anyone until late on Oct 1, when the co-owner asked me to send evidence of the DMCA because she ‘isn’t a fan of hear-say’, so I let her know I already sent all that to Voshie on Discord, but that I’d see if there’s anything else I can add.

The messages and notecards screenshots are below, nothing exciting there but if a rumor gets spread that I ‘pressured’ them or did anything else beyond what any copyright holder would do, I want the actual evidence all in one place showing my actual - and fairly polite at that - messages.

She at least had responded, although the “I’m not a fan of hear-say’ felt a bit like an accusation after already being brushed off by Voshie. I gave her the benefit of the doubt tho that maybe she didn’t mean it that way.
I sent Voshie extra screenshots and info, none of it necessary to see that Fairyzette was a repeat infringer as I’d already sent sufficient proof of that. See for yourself below.

And at the end of the day on the 3rd, which was already open to bloggers, and the night before opening day, I asked Arséne if this was still being addressed. She said they were still setting up and it would take some time. I still had hoped that they would take care of it before the event opened and sales started, but that didn’t happen. (screenshot of whole chat log at the bottom)
Her booth was up & ready for business.

Because it seemed the event owners / organizers were not giving this issue the urgency it deserved, I opened the group chat - and saw OTHER complaints of infringement. I learned Neon Sheep was accused of selling copybotted items. Their stall is also gone now, maybe that was a valid claim?
So I mentioned my own copycat issue without even mentioning her name yet, and nearly instantly got chastised for it and locked out of the chat.

Chat lag for We <3 Role-Play showing my comments on infringement and being locked out of the chat

Honestly, that wasn’t surprising, but the final response kinda was. I was still holding out hope that they’d make up somehow for taking so long to take care of this or at least have a better explanation why, and in the middle of the night after a full day of possible sales I got a message saying:
”Set up is done & also I do not appreciate that you are pressuring us about this that much. Thats said: We removed her since you provided us with the DMCA & we are hoping this matter will resolve itself for you. Best of luck!”

Screenshot of chat with Arséne

That was the extent of our communications, the screenshots can speak for themselves.
Should ‘we’re setting up’ still be an acceptable excuse by the time the event opens, sales start, and they could be liable as participants in contributory or vicarious infringement?
Genuinely, I’m curious if this kind of delay is standard in SL for sales events or not, as my only other experience was an organizer who removed the content very quickly and without snark.

The empty space where Fairyzette’s Les Sucreries De Fairy store sat, removed for copyright infringement

At least they did remove her booth, and I appreciate that they finally did what they were legally obligated to do.
I understand I may face backlash or exclusion for speaking out, but letting the public know what actually happened so misinformation doesn’t spread is important to me. I’d rather have the facts laid out here for all our sakes before a twisted version of events ends up on a site like the Virtual Burn Book.

I want honest customers who support artist rights to know when they may be unwittingly buying stolen IP based on my work, I know I would want to be informed.

Absinthe & Arsenic, Goblin Style

These toxically gorgeous wings drop on Monday, October 6 at 8pm PDT!

Iridescent green, blue and black fairy wings with antennae and small appendages sticking out from the tips, worn on a dress form, front view

Happy weekend fairies!

I've got this set of Goblin Princess fairy wings done in a variation of the Rollerbird painting that follows the Absinthe & Arsenic colorway I've dabbled in before, but this time I used the Opal iridescent film rather than the clear Diamond Fire for cooler toned greens with touches of blue.
They will be $489 plus shipping, and will be listing Monday night, Oct. 6 at 8pm PDT.

I hope to also have another set of wings if I can squeeze them in there but this might be the only set this week..

The listings will show up here at the start time:
https://fancy-fairy-wings-things.myshopify.com/collections/flash-sales

In my Second Life news, I was shocked to find out that one of the creators, Fairyzette Sahara of Les Sucreries De Fairy, who I reported for 3 different wing infringements early this year has actually doubled down and released one of them AGAIN with a few insignificant changes.

A side by side comparison showing my Acorn fairy wings on the left and the infringing copy by Fairyzette Sahara on the right

The sales event they were being sold at opened to the public yesterday, and after 4 days since I sent all the proof of ownership to the organizers the stolen content remained up until 1am this morning or so I’m told. Haven’t had a chance to check on it and there are RL things to take care of right now, so if there are any further updates I’ll make them here later.
Mentioning it in the event’s group chat yesterday since the organizers had still not acted, got me chastised for commenting and I was locked out of the chat, which is no surprise at this point. I've been learning that a lot of these events put language against copyright infringement in their rules but often don't actually care to enforce them or make them a lower priority than they should be :/
More on that on my PrimFeed account, which is a social media site for SL users:
https://www.primfeed.com/fancy-fairy-wings-things/posts/a3afd57b-df43-4b75-86e3-62cbffa05568
I might have more updates on this eventually.

Would you like to support me further? Consider joining my Patreon here:
https://www.patreon.com/c/faeryangela

A Positive Update

I’m happy to provide this update:

Angela Jarman (myself) and Hey Ricochet were recently involved in a copyright infringement matter. We are pleased to share that the issue has been amicably resolved to the satisfaction of both sides. The parties agree that they took no intentional steps to harm each other. We appreciate the opportunity to address the matter constructively and are happy to move forward.